Sam Stobbart, ex girlfriend of murderer Raoul Moat has shared her story about the abuse she suffered at his hands. In The News of The World’s interview with her, she talks about when he slapped her every other day, when he raped her, stamped on her stomach, punched her in the spine and gave her daughter a black eye by hurling a stool at her.
Sam’s report on the rape was: “He didn’t ASK me for sex, he just pushed me on to the sofa and pulled my clothes off, all my clothes.”
“Moat thought sex was his right.”
Sadly, this is the case with a million more relationships. Sam was a prisoner to Moat, she describes his power from body-building and steroid taking: “He could lift me up with one hand. I’m barely eight stone.”
Personally, I don’t think there is enough thoughts and attention paid to this horror that a woman had to live through. Sam got together with Moat when she was merely sixteen. Sam was essentially vulnerable and impressionable, of which Moat took full advantage. After the usual honey-moon period of bliss, Sam talks about how the slightest thing would set him off. She talks about how Moat beat over 30 men up in pubs because they looked at Sam. He would call her his “trophy girlfriend” and say that “no one should look at her”.
If you think this is a healthy relationship, you should seek help now, because you obviously have ’sick bastard syndrome’. The remedy for this is a rope around the neck or 50 painkillers and a bottle of vodka.
No amount of Photoshop>Blur>Overlay will make this man look like anything more than an ugly bastard.
On the other hand, you’re probably shocked and disgusted at this kind of treatment of a woman. Then it will shock you even more to visit R.I.P Raoul Moat on Facebook. Some of the newer comments, in light of Sam’s story are here for you to see.
Darren Dazaster Trapps: “…and as for Stobbard, saying she was raped.. how else was she gonna get a shag?? bloody smack rat.”
To this, someone replies:
Harry Harry Harri: “Stobbard makes wild claims that she was raped – wishful thinking on her part! She made no claim of this ever before, no allegations to police, no allegations to medical professionals or other law enforcement or statutory public body. These allegations of rape are not only fake but slander on a dead man’s name. Moat is not around to defend himself after being unlawfully killed by police. He was never questioned, cautioned, charged, arrested or convicted over any rape allegations. Stobbard changes her story to suit any chavvy murdoch newspaper. She is a liar and cheat – blood is on her hands not only for her boyfriend who was shot but also the policeman who was blinded. RIP MOAT”
Like… Where to start, you know? First of all, LEARN HER FUCKING NAME. It’s Stobbart, not Stobbard. Then, “wishful thinking” – Yes, because every woman wishes for rape. That’s exactly how it works you complete arsehole. Also, she never made the claim to the police because her roid-monkey tormentor would have battered her to death. And yes, she released her story now after he’s dead because he shot her for dumping him. What might have happened if she told the police he’d raped her. Put two and two together – if that’s possible for you. Then he’s off slagging Murdoch papers… jesus fuck. I’m soooo sure you read totally upper-class newspapers, with all your correct grammar and well-read vibes I get from you – NOT.
The comments on the article on line are even worse.
Marian writes: “Dear Miss Stobbart
Enough, there are real victims to this story.
PC Rathband – blinded
Your Ex, no the one after Raoul Moat, the one he shot remember? The one you replaced Raoul with.
His Family. His Children, Moat’s other children that you know of, and then you. You are the only one making money out of this, isn’t that a bit sad.”
Yes, being raped and battered isn’t worthy of being a victim. In fact, I’d say Sam Stobbart was probably grateful for the beatings and rape. She’s cheerily talking about it on video right there. Tears of happiness, eh? NOT.
Then ‘lisa babe’ writes: “Tall story.
I feel sorry for the next person who has the displeasure of dating her. I had to stop reading-I could not read any more of her nonsense. Not that I am in any way a Moat fan. Please don’t encourage more stories and pay her, I simply won’t be reading.
Condolences to Chris and family and thinking of the Police officer and his. God bless you’s.”
‘lisa babe’ I don’t think she’ll be ready to date anyone for a while, considerng that her boyfriend was just shot and killed by a psycho. No need to worry – OH WAIT it was nothing to do with you anyway!
I could go on, but to be frank, I can’t try to process any more of these horrible, evil two-cents worth pieces any more. There’s at least one comment I agree with:
John “I hope she gets aload of money even if it’s just to annoy some of you jelous lot on here. She was frightened of him and given the fact he shot her, dont you think she had ever reason to be scared? Now she just wants to give her side of the story so that people can see why she did what she did.
Also, you lot have no idea what is going on behind the scences so stop speculating about things you dont have a clue about. I cannot believe some of you are even suggesting that she doesn’t give a damn about her new boyfriends death or whats happened.”
Yes, John. I agree. I hope she does get compensation for living her live as a slave to a vicious murderer and beast. People saying she’s just cashing in are quite clearly jealous at the prospect of a woman getting money. So fuck? Money is money and people want it. Get over it. Sam is only a face in the sea of the faceless 1 in 4 women who suffer rape and the millions more who are slaves and punch bags in their own homes.
My closing message to these people is that the Internet is a forum for people to say whatever the fuck they like, but it’s not big or impressive. All you’re showing is that you’re condoning violence and sex crimes towards women. Learn to be a human being, and learn to fucking spell while you’re at it.
How women end up stuck in abusive relationships. Click to View.
And my closing message to those reading this is that we need to take violence and hate crimes against women in hand. This is not about equal pay and women getting the vote, this is about a war against women. The statistics show that a majority of women are in unhappy relationships due to oppression. Violent men compensate for their own shortcomings (Low self esteem, bad days, poverty, anger problems, inferiority complexes etc) by picking on those they see as being on a lower social rung – Women. They beat, rape and abuse the people who trust and love them, leaving mental and physical scarring. This is a torture device to vent the anger of men who can’t change or deal with not getting their own way.
This method of taking power has been around since forever. Men are instilled with the idea that if you can’t get what you want, you simply take it, or make someone else pay for your trouble. Those men are happy to have a punchbag and a sex doll to rape all their anger into, but what the public need to understand is that she’s screaming and crying out for help – those cries fall on the deaf ears of a patriarchal society, as shown by the reactions to Sam Stobbart’s horrific account.
Think for a moment. Would you help a woman who was being beaten by her boyfriend? Of course you would. Be it passively (Phoning the police) or actively intervening. Would you help is she were wearing a short skirt and heels? What is she were a black woman?
You might think “Of course,” Although, unfortunately, this is rarely the case.
American show, “What Would You Do” ran an episode on scenarios where actresses dressed in what would be considered “respectable” clothing created a scene in a restaurant where there are being abused by their boyfriends. (Videos can be found here. It’s not a great website, but this is where I found them)
Daubed with make-up to resemble horrific bruises, the first woman, white, sits down at a table in the restaurant, obviously distressed. As quick as gunfire, a man with his wife come over to check is she is okay. They ask tactfully is she’s in need of any help, which she panics and declines and insists that her boyfriend will be mad when he comes if he sees her talking to them. The reluctantly back off and sit down. The boyfriend arrives in all his seething glory. He starts belittling her and grabbing at her, however, he gets nowhere with it. The man and woman at the adjacent table jump up and intervene. The boyfriend reaches and snatches even more violently at the woman’s arm, and a man whom we have no seen in the clip before walks over and physically pushes the abuser away. And this is one hefty shove. He then points in the guys face and tell him to back off.
This is pretty powerful. I was relieved to see that the couple acted so fast, and how the other guy, who is only passing at the time, reacted fast. The scenario is repeated with a black actress, and this time, it is a concerned woman who jumps to her rescue. The woman beelines over immediately when the boyfriend stands to order food. They immediately try to remove her form the situation, to make her safe. This is an emotionally charged scene as the rescuer starts to cry. She holds intently onto the abused woman’s arm as the boyfriend comes back. She confronts him about the abuse and he tries to take his girlfriend (Read:Slave) back home, the woman screams in his face. It is at this point the scene is cut short by the host.
After both these situations, the host interviews the spectators and intervening parties. They tell the host that they couldn’t just sit and let it happen, because if they were in the same position, they would want someone to help them. Good, human responses. It almost restores your faith in humanity, right?
Well, not in the next situation.
The way the women were to be dressed for the next scenario. Not even very much flesh revealed. Just goes to show how ready the public are to scorn.
The next scenarios are basically the same, apart from the fact that the women are wearing short-ish (I wouldn’t even really call them short, to be honest) low cut dresses. The subject matter of the argument is the woman’s clothes. The boyfriend berates her and spits insults across the table, makes grabs for the woman’s already bruised arms, and at one point, forces her to take her cardigan off to show everyone how much of a ’slut’ she looked. He stops a foot short of actually starting to rip her dress off too, but since these people are actors and actresses, they would not. However, that’s not to say this kind of humiliation doesn’t happen. Abusers like to show everyone how awful their girlfriend (Read:Slave) actually is in a crass attempt to justify their actions, in their own twisted little brains. Anyway. As you might have guess, not a single person intervenes this time. People rubber neck and whisper, but no one will help.
The second clip, however, is much, much more painful to watch. The black actress dons a black strappy dress and is abused in the same why by her abuser. This time, an affronted couple complain to the abuser and his victim about all the racket they’re making! And suggest that they are just embarrassing themselves! (He nods at the battered, bruised woman at this point). He tells them that it isn’t the time or the place. People would rather you were abused in private. They don’t want to know about it, let alone help you – if you’re showing flesh. Two woman also move away from the table. They then sit and speculate if the woman might be a prostitute! Like it matters?
Society likes to confused and abuse women. Women aren’t just expected to dress one way. It’s not happening. If you dress too ‘conservatively’ you’re a prude. If you dress too ‘revealingly’ you’re a slut. Women’s clothes come down to one thing, will put out/won’t put out. (Or deserves it/doesn’t deserve it) An example of this: What kind of clothes for men are ’slutty’? No one can answer this question in a definite manner, and this may be because men can’t be ’sluts’ or because everyone has a different opinion on this. However, if I say to you, short skirt or hot-pants, stiletto heeled boots and a boob tube, everyone will immediately cry out “SLUT!” (what if I told you the woman was celibate and had been all her life? Is she still asking to be raped?)
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not using these short films as super solid evidence. I would love to imagine that both these clips were just coincidentally filmed in a restaurant full of bastards, but that would be wishful thinking. Women in relationships are just as vulnerable to attack from anyone as their partner – maybe even more so. Sexual assault within a marriage is common. It’s common, but no one accepts it because when you tie the knot, our society takes away your right to say no. It’s no longer your body. A UK survey of 6,944 women who’d suffered rape, almost half (45%) had been raped by a partner. Women are expected, by society, to SERVE THEIR PARTNER. To no end of their own, a woman must have sex with a man when he wants it and damn well shut up about it. It’s not rape, you daft bint, it was just be having sex with you. WRONG. Men receive far too much sympathy for their fucking sexual needs. All too many times you hear men being excused for rape because a woman flirted with them. It’s all sympathy sympathy, he didn’t get to blow a load. Oh well, his cock won’t fucking explode you stupid fucking bastards. She, however, has just lost her dignity and will suffer trauma, flashbacks and a dysfunctional sex life for a very long time. What’s a lost erection to that?
This ties into the What Would You Do episode in every way. People see abuse as ‘a domestic’. It’s not something to get involved in, and much less if the woman looks like she may be provoking it. The same goes for when the woman is trying to defend herself. If she raises her voice or hits back, it’s no longer abuse, but a fight. And fights are okay. No matter who hit first, they’re just as bad as each other. WRONG. You cannot sneer in the face of a brave woman defending herself. Not every abused woman is a frightened, hunched, vulnerable girl. Some women DO try to fight back, and more often than not, end up worse off for it. This should never mean that she is discredited as a victim. Nor should she who dresses in whichever way she wants. When a woman dons a dress, she does not throw away her rights.
Yes, people do have bums, but this isn’t the nub and gist of the argument here. Sexist advertising? That’s okay. The word bum? Not. I think someone has their priorities mixed up around here.
According to the BBC News website, Glasgow City Council refused to let Reebok advertise their new trainers that tone your arse on the side of their taxis. The Reebok ad people claim that there wouldn’t even have been an actual bum present on the taxi, but only a pair of bare legs, but Glasgow City Council still opposed the ads.
HEL-LO?!
Diamond Dolls. Fucking lap-dancing/strip clubs (Or whatever the hell they do in there) are allowed on the side of taxis, yet the word ‘bum’ would be a scandal? What’s easier to explain to a child? What a bum is (And ALL fucking children know what a fucking bum is) or what Diamond Dolls is? “Yes darling, it’s just a place where ladies take their clothes off so that men can look at their private parts,”
The response from Glasgow City Council should have been to tell Reebok to fuck off and take their sexist advertising else where.
Everyone knows that it’s basically the plot of every commercial company everywhere to exploit the vulnerabilities of people, but Reebok don’t hide it very well. They’re basically telling women “You’ve got a shite arse. It’s like a bag of spanners. I know you fucking love Mars Bars and don’t have the money for a treadmill, but here! Here’s some shoes that will basically do the job for you!”
It’s just one of the tiny cogs in the mass media advertising attack on women. It’s all about fixing women. They’re not fucking right, you know? They need fixing! Mitchell and Webb have done a sketch to this effect, which is funny, and painfully true.
The point I’d like to make is that I’m not defending anyone in this horrible, horrible mash-up of awfulness. Basically both Reebok and the council are bastards. Reebok don’t even advertise their misogynistic trainers in a nice way either. One of their adverts features a female speaking about the trainers and inevitably, there are many hillarious (not) moments where the camera man fixes the camera on her bum and she takes it all in light hearted humour. A note to all women. Men who stare at your bum though a lens without your permission are perverts and should be put in jail (Or shot, in my opinion).
And would you look at that, she’s being deliberately provocative, but she doesn’t ACTUALLY want the cameraman to look at her bum. HOH HOH HOH what a slut! (Says the sexist wanker fraternity).
This kind of portrayal of women is actively harmful. It gives out the subtle, but present message that women are all just asking to be ogled, and if they move in a certain way that also means they want you to look at them or have sex with them. Women will simply not follow a rule book of modest actions and curbed expression for fear of being raped. Men will have to live with the fact that just because they THINK they have a right to make moves on a woman, does not make it remotely so.
Reebok probably think that they’re mighty funny. Woman have bums! HUURRR! That is excruciatingly obvious in this tacky sham of an advertisement that interrupted my meal time a couple of weeks ago.
First of all, we women can’t even see our arses most of the time. What fucking benefit would we reap from having it ‘toned’? None. Men, however, who are all too willing to stare, will. And obviously they’d prefer a worked arse to a perfectly normal sized and shaped bum. In other words, they want to make us look a certain way. Shock horror, eh?
“Shake it up make me feel good”? Don’t even get me started on the song.
My closing point is one which I feel true to, and that i think all women in the world should take on as not only a mindset, but a way of life. I’ve thought about it deeply for a long time, and I feel like no other approach could encompass the range of emotions that women feel in an oppressed, male dominated society: ”Fuck off.”
Awritey mah wee chummos! Yur auld pal Lydia here, joost back fae Edinburger again. This time though, ah wisnae houndin’ the auld SDL, bit ah wis greetin’ mah chum best David Wankeron. Welcomin’ ‘um tae bonnie wee Scotland, cause like, presumably like, he’s nevur been here ur anyhin. Tae be fair ‘es prolly seen pichurs aye the highlands n aw that it ‘es posh Uni. Bit ‘es nevur seen us common folks before, so it wis prolly a bit ay a shocker fur ‘um like. Shame, eh? NAW.
Anywey. So whit actually happened like, wis we goat telt last night thit big DivCam the Sham would be in Scotland fur a wham-bam wi big Lecko Salmond. So we quickly organised and goat folk up tae Edinburger the next mornin’.
When we goat there, thur wis only a sparse group ‘ay people ootside the Scottish Parliament, an a hink they wur joost there tae gee Cam the auld eyeballin’. So we gets wur gear oot, wur obviously fucken amazin’ banners an aw that. An we situates wirsels it the side door ay the parliament, waiting fur good auld shiny face tae make an appearance.
Bit ‘eh disnae. Bit we staun there anywey, we shout ‘n’ chant. Joost the usual banter aboot tellin’ the Tory mob tae fuck off an that. Thur wis a real energy, ye know? People aw there fur the same cause n aw that. Aw these enthusiastic peopo who aw want tae batter David Cameron’s fucken heid in. Ahh it wis brilliant. But anywey, it wis really good an aw that, bit we started tae get a wee bit suspecious ken, cause like, DivCam wisnea makin’ an appearance, so we mosied oan doon tae the front entrance tae make sure the slimey bastard didny gee us the slip like.
Roon ‘it the front, it wis strange, like cause there wis a wee walkway set up fur his majesty an that, bit like eh polis would let a pansy Eton scum boey walk through a crowd ‘ay ragin’ Scottish peope who didny vote fur the cunt! It was aw so suspicious, ken, We wur shoutin’ loud enough fur fuckin’ Westminster tae hear us, so ahm no surprised thit they decided no tae ship the gold in through the front. So eventually, we gets aw the info. It aw comes oot.
Roon 'eh side ay the Parliament buildens.
Turns oot thit the sly basturts huv shipped ‘um in through the fucken bat cave doonstairs! An undergroon car park, ken! (Good tae know wur taxes are bein spent fucken wisely like!) An then they smuggled ‘um back oot! An let me tell ye, we wur pissed off thit we didny get tae scream in ‘es mush, but we wur well chuffed thit ‘e wis too much ay a fucken cowardly scumbag basturd thit ‘e couldny even face the fucken peopo ‘e wis tryin’ tae extend a fucken olive branch tae, like. Aye fucken right. Wur no gonnae sit an let that cunt make oot like wur fucken best pals wi the wanker. Ahm no ‘ed fucken pal. Ah HATE ‘um! AH HATE CAMERON!
Anywey, so we kinna joost started tae go hame, an we goat a wee bit doon ‘eh road n’ somecunt phones us an gees us the lowdoon thit the Toff Wank is in St Andrew’s hoose. So we dis a u-turn n sannies it up tae St Andrew’s hoose. (Another fucken grande waste ay tax money) an whin we get there, this big disaster kinna happened. See, we goat split up. Some ay us goat there furst an whin mah group goat there, aw we coul see wis the others aw fucken fenced in in this tiny kettoh. Ah wis lit “Aw naw man, geis peace,”
So the polis comes slimin’ up tae us an wis aw lit “Ye need tae go ower there, mate.”
An we wur lit. “Naw.”
An they wur lit “Bit we’ll gee yeese the heids up if ‘eh comes!”
An we wur lit “Dae we look lit fannies tae you? Naw, mate. Take yur leave,”
So the banter goes oan fur a wee bit, but they don’t manage tae gets us penned up lit wur pals. So we joost wait aboot fur um, annoyin’ the polis in a kinna casual wey like. These two mad poshos wur pure staunin’ lookin’ it us lit we wur aliens. Well, obviously we wur tae thame cause we didny huve suits, briefcases n a look oan our faces lit a duig hud shat in wur shoes.
Fucken ragin' an that.
So the big momento arrives. It wis glorious mah chummos. He comes oot wey a pure smug look on his gleamin’ mush. An we wur joost pure lit “SCUM SCUMS SCUM! YA BASS!” An ‘es wee ginger LibDem gimp nearly started greetin’ and pure dived in the motor. DivCam’s smiled kinna dripped aff lit cauld tamatae soup. We hailed ‘um oot wi wur chants an somecunt threw an egg which burst aw oor (no ‘es puss unfortunately) the motor windae as it sped the fuck ootae poor-land.
Joost goes tae show ye thit DivCam couldny gee two fucks aboot us an nevur fucken will. Cause fur a start ‘es too fucken scared tae own up tae the fucken crimes the Tories committed tae us in the past. ‘E cannae face us an ‘e fucken proved it the day wi ‘es smugglin’ in an oot ay places wi fucking high-vis wanker protection.
It makes me grit my teeth every time I see one of the variations of these groups on facebook about “When i was your age, I was <insert something about Pokemon here> not <insert something about getting pregnant here>
First and foremost, as pointed out by Sarah, if you’re at the age where you had Pokemon in your childhood, you’re not fucking old enough to preach anything to anyone about “When I was your age”. “When I was your age is reserved for when you’re an actual established adult. (which is debatable if you’re over 18 and still joining facebook fan pages dedicated to laying hate on an opressed group)
I don't remember him being branded a 'slut'. I DO remember the girl being SLAUGHTERED by the media, while the wee guy was branded a 'victim' and pitied.
Where’s all the hate-filled groups about teenage dads? It takes two to fucking tango, and do you not think it’s enough punishment to have to squeeze a screaming brat out of your fanny and then take care of it for 16 years without your pretentious bastard scrutiny and mockery? Most girls who end up pregnant as teenagers end up with the entire burden as the guy goes off to live his life. I think losing your opportunities, hopes, dreams and freedom is a big enough punishment from the patriarchal had of society without a generation of deely-bopper snooty CHILDREN trying to look down on them.
It’s a total ploy to make non-pregnant FAILED teenagers feel better about themselves.
Working Class has a high concentration of teenage pregnancies because shitty state schools do NOT offer adequate sex education (And for Catholic Schools, none at all). Young girls AND BOYS aren’t taught responsibility and the repercussions of having unprotected sex. This is not their fault. The only people who would see teenage pregnancy as the mother’s fault would be those so uneducated themselves, that they fail to see what wrong has been done to the young woman.
Young women in working class areas are vulnerable and in a bad position to begin with. This is due to the Capitalist way of Britain (And most of the world). You have insanely rich people, who have access to the right kind of education and amenities (and yes, I’m saying birth control is an AMENITY) to avoid that kind of situation, and SHOULD a well off woman get pregnant, she will NOT have to struggle along for the next 16-18 years. She’ll be well looked after and have all the supplies she needs.
“
A GRAPH TO PROVE MY POINT! Click to Enlarge
People WILL get pregnant during their teenage years. It’s a fact. It’s always been happening. It’s not some new epidemic, it only seems that way to teenagers now because it’s around them and they were too young to notice before. Plus, remember when you were wee, and teenagers of like 14 were basically big adults to you? Well, yes, if they got pregnant, in your tiny mind, it was okay back then.
Now, you see everything in a different light, and it’s all “She’s such a <insert misogynistic term here> cause she’s pregnant,”. Well, it could have easily happened to anyone. People forget birth control it sometimes fails or any other kind of unfortunate circumstance. What I’m saying is, shut your fucking mouth until you know the reasons behind teenage pregnancy.
People use misogyny as the nice, acceptable fascism to scapegoat on people. Racism is less acceptable now and they’re young people themselves. Women are the only way out. they’re getting all our housing cause they’ve got kids, they use all the benefits.
Naw mate. Go up the town and have a wee look at the bank buildings. RBS? Lloyds TSB? Aye, THAT’S where all your fucking (not well earnt cause you’ve never been taxed in your fucking life) tax money went. Fucking benefits, don’t kid yourself. If benefits were that high, we wouldn’t be in this position, but you wouldn’t really know because all you listen to is The fucking Daily Mail and old people going on about shit they don’t know anything about.
Awrite mah we muckers, It’s Wee Lydia Teapot here again mate.
Joost wahnteed tae droap in a wee message tae say that ahm fucken SHITTIN mahself aboot this Prime Minister buisness. Ah ken thit the Tories goat the maist seats but no a majority. Whit dis that mean? A hung Parliament? (Aye, ah’d like tae see thum aw hung tae be honest) ur an over rule by David “Thatcher” Cameron? Ah’d rather be kneecapped tae be honest.
Listen mah wee chumpos, A’ve goat a plan though. T’night wur gaunny rally against these wankers. Independence the fucken noo. You should dae it tae. Get yur clogs oan and dae whit ye need tae dae tae send oot the message thit you’re no an idiot ‘n’ thit ye wahnt yer fucken freedom fae the Tory mob.
Perty it George Sqr th’night anaw. See ye there mah wee muckers. (If ah’ve no shat mah brains oot in fear that is)
Over ‘n’ oot mah wee muckers.
Ahm hinkin' sumthin lit this...
Some Facebook groups regardin’ events thit ur gaun oan:
Here, ma wee chumpos and chumpettes, you’ll no believe this, bit ah’ll huv tae tell ye.
Thur out there. Lit sum kinna fucken zombie invasion, they walk amung is. They look lit normal people, but thur no. Thu’ll shout ‘it ye.
The peopo ahm on aboot, my wee muckers, thur the Troofers. “We ur Change” They caw thursels.
“9/11 Troof, mate”
Basically, whit these goons ur aw aboot is sayin’ thit every cunt is oot tae get thum. (Sounds lit me eftir wan too many wee draws, eh?) They pure hink thit 9/11 wis an inside job. Based on whit evidence? Aye, well, thu’ll no fucken say, will they? They talk sum amount ‘ay pish. Ye kin see sum ‘ay that pish if ye want, by the way, ye joost huve too look right here.http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090506155958670
So whit they’re sayin’ is: “How many times has this happened to you? You are explaining to someone some of the rational, logical reasons why the official story of 9/11 can’t be true, perhaps explaining how WTC 7 fell in the exact manner of a professionally planned controlled demolition — a job which would typically take weeks to prepare — when out comes a ‘thought stopper’ phrase like:
“That’s just anotherconspiracy theory!” or …
“Do you also believe in Big Foot and tin foil hats?” “
Diagram to help the crazy people.
Right-o, mate, first thing first: Whit ur ye fucken talkin’ aboot? Ah didnae know ye wur a fucking demolition expert fur a start. How the fuck kin ye define a buildin’ fawin’ a certain fucken wey? And ye know why people ask ye if ye believe in big foot ‘n’ tin foil hats? Cause other nutters believe in that. And nae offense mate, but whin yur thinkin’ ay the style a buildin’ faws in when ye kin CLEARLY fucken see a PLANE flyin’ straight intae the fucken side, you are a fucken tube. ‘N’ by the way, if ye think ahm wrang, then read further oan in that walloper’s article. He starts bangin’ oan aboot how Pearl Harbour wis an inside joab anaw. Is everythin’ a fucken inside joab? Whit aboot when mah mail’s late? Inside joab? You’re an inside jobby, mate. Nae doubt about it. Aw ay this is apprently part ‘ay the 6 reasons why people dinnae accept the 9/11 truth (They leave oot the bit aboot the real truth – ye know, the planes flyin’ intae the towers… anybudy?) It’s reason A, The Big Lie!
Next is aboot how people find the government scary (Ah find it scary anaw, but mere tae dae wi me no bein able tae get a fucken joab if the Tories get in). So fuck? That’s no a fuckin’ valid reason! Whit ye mean is this ye don’t huv a clue! Eftir this point, they basically joost talk aboot how cunts ur stupit.
So summary ‘ay the reason nae cunt believes in the “Troof aboot 9/11” is cause wur aw daft ‘n’ canny staun up fur wursels. Me, wee Lydia Tee would like tae propose a different reason: Cause it’s no the Troof. It’s sumhin you made up whin ye wur board ‘n’ single, mate. Get a fucken life.
Thur puntin’ that Holly Greig scandal anaw. Dunno if yu’ve heard – they write it oan the waws ‘n’ grun wi chalk, cause thur hard-fucken-core. Supposedly the whole fucken world is wrapped up in coverin’ up this wee lassie’s sexual abuse. Aye, the polis wur probably fucken cunts aboot it (They eywis fucken ur! Ahm a no wrang, chums?), but it doesny mean thit it’s a big mad conspiracy, pal. It’s been rammed intae mah eyesockets in every fucken wey. Facebook groups, chalk oan the pavement, leaflets, cunts coming up tae me oan the street (Fucken stoap it, ah fucken mean it, ya bass!)
Ahm no sayin the abuse didny happen, but ahm sayin’ it’s no been a big cover-up. Ah fucken went there. Aye, ah did. Whit ur ye gonnae dae?! The people involved in it urnae high up enough tae spark some kind ay Steven Purcell type-ay action. It’s jist another wan ay these nutters way to much time oan their hauns. Bit it disnae matter, cause wi Windows Movie Maker, n sum acoustic guitar music , ye kin make anybudy believe it.
Aye, the chalk oan the pavement hing. That’s wan ay thur weys ay getting thur point acroass. Bit the flaw is that nae cunt understauns whit the fuck “Wake up” ur “Everything is okay” fucken means. They just walk oan by tae get tae fucken Coffee Republic. Nae cunt cares. They sometimes staun aboot wi thur megaphones shoutin’ aboot how the world is fucked ‘n’ that. Y’know who else dis that in the same place? The wee scary christian guy that tells everyone on the way past thur gaun tae hell. News flash fur yeese mad Troofurs, ah don’t gi a fuck aboot whit he’s goat tae say either, cause coincidently, like youse, he canny back it up… At least ye kin actually understaun whit the wee christian guy is oan aboot cause he’s goat a decent sound system.
I SOOOO want to believe everything this guy says.
Jared Gomes, whoever the fuck he is, talks in this video ( Beware, mental content unsuitable for sane viewers )
Ah couldny huv told ye the furst hing aboot this guy, bit whin ah wis watching, I couldny tell ye whit ‘e wis oan aboot either. He’s tellin’ me thit it’s a wee group in the government thit ah should hate ‘n’ no the full government – bit wait a fucken minute, ah thoat the whole hing wis a hierarchy ‘ay control ‘n’ lies? Then whit, dis it end at that wee group? Make up yer fucken minds! The whole video is a fucken joke tae be honest wi yeese, ma muckers. It’s aw fuzzy megphone yellin’ some ay the auld chalky pavement. That ‘N’ peope cuddlin each other… Joost naw. (Fur the record, if anycunt tries tae cuddle me in the street is an attempt tae spread the love, ah’ll spread thur noses acroass thur faces wi mah fist…) Then thur’s the auld heavy metal music adored everywhere by 13 year auld cunts wi mere metal hingin’ oot thur boady thin’ fucken robo-cop ‘n’ Inspector Gadget’s love-wean. (Here, hing oan a minute… whit did that Jared Gomes cunt look like again..?)
Aw ‘n’ thur’s a nice wee bit ay climate change denial in there anaw. Ah suppose it’s cause the sun’s oot tae get me anaw. At the end, the obnoxiously annoyin’ fucken voice begs me tae dae mah ain research, an ah huv. So should you tae. Cause yu’ll learn thit “We Ur Change” ur a load ay pish. Don’t buy intae thur crazy talk, don’t smoke whit their smokin’. It’s no good fur ye, yu’ll joost turn intae wan ay thame.
‘N’ specially fur me, mah wee chummos, if ye see thum in the street, dae somthin aboot it. Thur liars ‘n’ panic merchants who dinnae deserve the time ‘ay day.
clips were just coincidentally filmed in a restaurant full of bastards, but that would be wishful thinking. Women in relationships are just as vulnerable to attack from anyone as their partner – maybe even more so. Sexual assault within a marriage is common. It’s common, but no one accepts it because when you tie the knot, our society takes away your right to say no. It’s no longer your body. 
Oh my god a bum! People have bums?!
Entries (RSS)