<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Square Go wi the SDL in Edinburger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:47:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fiannanahalba</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>fiannanahalba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I know violence is a serious business Jack, ive got two friends in Maghaberry looking at twenty years each. Just be honest, the majority of socialists in the disUK are opposed to violence and believe that only mass action and propaganda can bring socialism. For m y part i believe the working class will need to deploy a degree of organised and disciplined violence in its twin tasks of socialist revolution and national liberation, not to mention self defence and internal security, when faced with the uncomprimising and extremely coercive and violent imperialist British state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know violence is a serious business Jack, ive got two friends in Maghaberry looking at twenty years each. Just be honest, the majority of socialists in the disUK are opposed to violence and believe that only mass action and propaganda can bring socialism. For m y part i believe the working class will need to deploy a degree of organised and disciplined violence in its twin tasks of socialist revolution and national liberation, not to mention self defence and internal security, when faced with the uncomprimising and extremely coercive and violent imperialist British state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-405</guid>
		<description>I feel I should point out that in previous comment debates about multiculturalism etc. what I posted represented my own views rather than debated and agreed positions of SSY. I&#039;m hoping that these kinds of debates can go a bit further at Camp Secret Squirrel and if EAFA/GAFA agree to hold a conference, which I&#039;ll propose at the open meeting on Sat.

I think the problem here is that you seem to have a split personality in posting. Often you&#039;ll open a discussion with what are, frankly, apolitical (and often inaccurate) insults about SSY members, their class background, the way they speak and dress etc. Then when this gets people riled up (presumably what you were trying to achieve anyway), you try and back away, and say you&#039;re just interested in healthy debate, you&#039;re the reasonable one etc. You can&#039;t have it both ways. You say you want fraternal debate but your behaviour indicates otherwise.

On the issue of violence, I&#039;ll state it again-I&#039;m not a pacifist. I believe in the position &quot;self-defence is no offence&quot;. One of the first things that helped get me political was an awareness of the case of Satpal Ram (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satpal_Ram). However, I also don&#039;t believe in fetishising violence, and indeed think that this is a major problem with many sections of the left. Tactics need to be judged on the situation, and imo SSY members, as part of GAFA and EAFA, have deployed the right tactics for the situation against the SDL (albeit more effectively in Edinburgh, having learnt from the experience in Glasgow.) Going out looking for a fight would have been the WRONG tactics in these situations.

Violence is a serious business, and when it&#039;s necessary it&#039;s not something to be gloried in. I was recently listening to a documentary about the history of anti-fascist organising in London in the 70s (which I intend to post here when I can make the getiplayer thing work). In that situation, with gangs of racists roaming the streets at night looking to attack people, self defence training and an organised street presence were clearly necessary. (Although btw that was always accompanied with mass mobilisations to occupy the streets.) That&#039;s not the situation we&#039;re in right now.

What&#039;s completely unhelpful and infantile is people coming on to go &quot;you middle class students aren&#039;t as hard as us.&quot; It&#039;s fantasising about violence, and doesn&#039;t take us any further forward in terms of serious politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel I should point out that in previous comment debates about multiculturalism etc. what I posted represented my own views rather than debated and agreed positions of SSY. I&#8217;m hoping that these kinds of debates can go a bit further at Camp Secret Squirrel and if EAFA/GAFA agree to hold a conference, which I&#8217;ll propose at the open meeting on Sat.</p>
<p>I think the problem here is that you seem to have a split personality in posting. Often you&#8217;ll open a discussion with what are, frankly, apolitical (and often inaccurate) insults about SSY members, their class background, the way they speak and dress etc. Then when this gets people riled up (presumably what you were trying to achieve anyway), you try and back away, and say you&#8217;re just interested in healthy debate, you&#8217;re the reasonable one etc. You can&#8217;t have it both ways. You say you want fraternal debate but your behaviour indicates otherwise.</p>
<p>On the issue of violence, I&#8217;ll state it again-I&#8217;m not a pacifist. I believe in the position &#8220;self-defence is no offence&#8221;. One of the first things that helped get me political was an awareness of the case of Satpal Ram (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satpal_Ram" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satpal_Ram</a>). However, I also don&#8217;t believe in fetishising violence, and indeed think that this is a major problem with many sections of the left. Tactics need to be judged on the situation, and imo SSY members, as part of GAFA and EAFA, have deployed the right tactics for the situation against the SDL (albeit more effectively in Edinburgh, having learnt from the experience in Glasgow.) Going out looking for a fight would have been the WRONG tactics in these situations.</p>
<p>Violence is a serious business, and when it&#8217;s necessary it&#8217;s not something to be gloried in. I was recently listening to a documentary about the history of anti-fascist organising in London in the 70s (which I intend to post here when I can make the getiplayer thing work). In that situation, with gangs of racists roaming the streets at night looking to attack people, self defence training and an organised street presence were clearly necessary. (Although btw that was always accompanied with mass mobilisations to occupy the streets.) That&#8217;s not the situation we&#8217;re in right now.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s completely unhelpful and infantile is people coming on to go &#8220;you middle class students aren&#8217;t as hard as us.&#8221; It&#8217;s fantasising about violence, and doesn&#8217;t take us any further forward in terms of serious politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiannanahalba</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>fiannanahalba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Lynsey i think my previous post attempts to answer your question. The SSY are associated closely with the SSP, therefore they are or should be of interest to all Scottish socialists, irrespective of age. It appears you have no interest in discussing or debating with me and thats been the case in all my experience of you at least since a few debates a good while ago on the SSP forum, fair enough your choice, although to be fair to the SSY and to their credit three or four posters, and i expect SSY members, do engage in discussion - that has given me a clearer understanding of the politics of the SSY on issues such as race/multiculturalism and the EDL and fascism and the SSY analysis and method of combatting it.

LydiaT im not so sure the EDL/SDL are more than capable of mobilising without police being informed or aware. Thats a tactic that they hold inreserve but one that im sure they now feel more confident of using when its tactically advantageous to them.

I cant see the SSY having any need or desire to hold anything more than a placard, a leaflet or paper.
On 3. of course.

On 4 thats probably true although what happened when the NF had their meeting in Glasgow recently? Youse wisely looked at the balance of forces and the possibility of violence and didnt go to their meeting place. Im no fool and certainly not advocating taking action that could result in the left/republicans etc getting seriously hurt or arrested.

I dont think im elitist, although i do believe theres a place for tactical flexibility and actions undertaken and carried out by certain comrades eg during the miners strike, the workers who carried out sabotage against scabs and scab haulage companies etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynsey i think my previous post attempts to answer your question. The SSY are associated closely with the SSP, therefore they are or should be of interest to all Scottish socialists, irrespective of age. It appears you have no interest in discussing or debating with me and thats been the case in all my experience of you at least since a few debates a good while ago on the SSP forum, fair enough your choice, although to be fair to the SSY and to their credit three or four posters, and i expect SSY members, do engage in discussion &#8211; that has given me a clearer understanding of the politics of the SSY on issues such as race/multiculturalism and the EDL and fascism and the SSY analysis and method of combatting it.</p>
<p>LydiaT im not so sure the EDL/SDL are more than capable of mobilising without police being informed or aware. Thats a tactic that they hold inreserve but one that im sure they now feel more confident of using when its tactically advantageous to them.</p>
<p>I cant see the SSY having any need or desire to hold anything more than a placard, a leaflet or paper.<br />
On 3. of course.</p>
<p>On 4 thats probably true although what happened when the NF had their meeting in Glasgow recently? Youse wisely looked at the balance of forces and the possibility of violence and didnt go to their meeting place. Im no fool and certainly not advocating taking action that could result in the left/republicans etc getting seriously hurt or arrested.</p>
<p>I dont think im elitist, although i do believe theres a place for tactical flexibility and actions undertaken and carried out by certain comrades eg during the miners strike, the workers who carried out sabotage against scabs and scab haulage companies etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LydiaTeapot</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>LydiaTeapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-389</guid>
		<description>fiannanahalba - Right so, we, according to you, wouldn&#039;t stand a chance against the fash if the police weren&#039;t there. Okay. Okay. Here is my problem with that statement:
1) The police aren&#039;t just going to dissapear. They are almost always going to be there. The end of the world isn&#039;t nigh, mate. 
2) What&#039;s you point? What are you insinuating? That we should all arm ourselves with shotguns and just blow their brains out? Are you suggesting that because we aren&#039;t megabots with lasers coming out of our eyes that we should just quit? 
3) Neither would you. 
4) We have never pulled out of a march if we doubted police presence. 

Let me try to make this clear to you: You aren&#039;t any different from us. If anyone&#039;s being an elitist cunt, it&#039;s you. Are you trying to tell us that you would go ahead with seven fash yourself? Tell you what, you tell me when it&#039;s happening and we&#039;ll come see you chib &#039;em aw maaaaan, since you&#039;re like a bajillion times more working class than us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fiannanahalba &#8211; Right so, we, according to you, wouldn&#8217;t stand a chance against the fash if the police weren&#8217;t there. Okay. Okay. Here is my problem with that statement:<br />
1) The police aren&#8217;t just going to dissapear. They are almost always going to be there. The end of the world isn&#8217;t nigh, mate.<br />
2) What&#8217;s you point? What are you insinuating? That we should all arm ourselves with shotguns and just blow their brains out? Are you suggesting that because we aren&#8217;t megabots with lasers coming out of our eyes that we should just quit?<br />
3) Neither would you.<br />
4) We have never pulled out of a march if we doubted police presence. </p>
<p>Let me try to make this clear to you: You aren&#8217;t any different from us. If anyone&#8217;s being an elitist cunt, it&#8217;s you. Are you trying to tell us that you would go ahead with seven fash yourself? Tell you what, you tell me when it&#8217;s happening and we&#8217;ll come see you chib &#8216;em aw maaaaan, since you&#8217;re like a bajillion times more working class than us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynsey</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-384</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is a space for SSY comrades between 16-26 etc etc- tell you what there are 18 year olds with the political heads of much older comrades on their shoulders and of course theres older comrades who are immature. Its not an issue – if youre good enough you re old enough.&quot;

Except that its an issue for us. What you&#039;ve said here shows that you (still) don&#039;t get the purpose of SSY. It&#039;s not some political training ground to groom us until we&#039;re ready to play with the older children; SSY is an autonomous, self-organising youth group in the same vein as the SSP Women&#039;s Network. We recognise that young people are discriminated against in Scotland today, and that we need a space to ourselves to discuss and fight our own battles against that discrimination, and to provide a space for political activity that is exclusively for young people. 

I really do have to ask, what is the obsession with us? You&#039;ve been coming on our forums and blogs to pick fights and call people middle class students for years, and you&#039;ve been getting told to piss off for years. What is it about us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is a space for SSY comrades between 16-26 etc etc- tell you what there are 18 year olds with the political heads of much older comrades on their shoulders and of course theres older comrades who are immature. Its not an issue – if youre good enough you re old enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except that its an issue for us. What you&#8217;ve said here shows that you (still) don&#8217;t get the purpose of SSY. It&#8217;s not some political training ground to groom us until we&#8217;re ready to play with the older children; SSY is an autonomous, self-organising youth group in the same vein as the SSP Women&#8217;s Network. We recognise that young people are discriminated against in Scotland today, and that we need a space to ourselves to discuss and fight our own battles against that discrimination, and to provide a space for political activity that is exclusively for young people. </p>
<p>I really do have to ask, what is the obsession with us? You&#8217;ve been coming on our forums and blogs to pick fights and call people middle class students for years, and you&#8217;ve been getting told to piss off for years. What is it about us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiannanahalba</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>fiannanahalba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Andy it was a decent mobilisation and it was certainly the kind of action needed-  compared to UAF/SWP/Scotland United- very good. I sincerely hope a strong unified socialist movement can arise again quickly in Scotland and the SSY could be important yeast in that process. Anti fascism anti racism and a republican socialist pro independence vision are just some important strands in that development and regroupment. There are big lessons to be learned from our shared past. Scotland is a small country where we are literally only one or two people removed from knowing each other or at least knowing of each other and you can magnify that 100 times in the left millieu. Perhaps we will see the development of a movement that is democratic and pluralist working together on the 80% agreement and fraternally debating the other 20%. When it comes to Scottish independence, anti imperialism, anti fascism/racism and working class issues theres lots of room for socialists, republicans, anarchists and other progressives to develop joint work.
Now given the nature of the net and the lack of face to face discussion, blogs like this allow for debate and indeed criticisms of each others politics- thats not a bad thing and can, whilst being a bit at times sharp and polemical as well as sometimes rude and piss taking, it can also let us see where people are politically coming from.
I think the SSY comes out of a tradition of outward looking and innovative socialist politics so im happy to discuss my politics and those of the two organisations of which iam a member the 32CSM and SRSM with the SSY/SSP, something the brit left groups are mostly incapable of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy it was a decent mobilisation and it was certainly the kind of action needed-  compared to UAF/SWP/Scotland United- very good. I sincerely hope a strong unified socialist movement can arise again quickly in Scotland and the SSY could be important yeast in that process. Anti fascism anti racism and a republican socialist pro independence vision are just some important strands in that development and regroupment. There are big lessons to be learned from our shared past. Scotland is a small country where we are literally only one or two people removed from knowing each other or at least knowing of each other and you can magnify that 100 times in the left millieu. Perhaps we will see the development of a movement that is democratic and pluralist working together on the 80% agreement and fraternally debating the other 20%. When it comes to Scottish independence, anti imperialism, anti fascism/racism and working class issues theres lots of room for socialists, republicans, anarchists and other progressives to develop joint work.<br />
Now given the nature of the net and the lack of face to face discussion, blogs like this allow for debate and indeed criticisms of each others politics- thats not a bad thing and can, whilst being a bit at times sharp and polemical as well as sometimes rude and piss taking, it can also let us see where people are politically coming from.<br />
I think the SSY comes out of a tradition of outward looking and innovative socialist politics so im happy to discuss my politics and those of the two organisations of which iam a member the 32CSM and SRSM with the SSY/SSP, something the brit left groups are mostly incapable of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiannanahalba</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>fiannanahalba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Go on enlighten me. This is a space for SSY comrades between 16-26 etc etc- tell you what there are 18 year olds with the political heads of much older comrades on their shoulders and of course theres older comrades who are immature. Its not an issue - if youre good enough you re old enough.

[NOTE ADDED BY ADMIN: This is incorrect - SSY has no minimum age limit, under 16 year olds can and do participate in SSY.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go on enlighten me. This is a space for SSY comrades between 16-26 etc etc- tell you what there are 18 year olds with the political heads of much older comrades on their shoulders and of course theres older comrades who are immature. Its not an issue &#8211; if youre good enough you re old enough.</p>
<p>[NOTE ADDED BY ADMIN: This is incorrect - SSY has no minimum age limit, under 16 year olds can and do participate in SSY.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bowden</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Ian the SSY doesn&#039;t have a banner. The SSP does, and given the amount of running about folk were doing carrying it I seriously doubt anyone would be able to do it stoned. 

You talk about discussion on programme and methods but I dont know what else we could have done differently. The facts are most people on the Left are like most normal people - they don&#039;t go out and get into fights all the time and they dont actively seek getting into them the way some of the fascists might do. 

This is because folk round about and in the SDL are asocial nutters who often dont have the basic respect for other folk most working people have and dont see anything unacceptable about living your life fighting wi folk all the time. Different people have different roles and you need to accept that the majority of folk who go on anti fascist demos probably arent psychos like the SDL, and make sure you have the numbers so if they try anything physical they wont win. I think weve successfully done that on both occasions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian the SSY doesn&#8217;t have a banner. The SSP does, and given the amount of running about folk were doing carrying it I seriously doubt anyone would be able to do it stoned. </p>
<p>You talk about discussion on programme and methods but I dont know what else we could have done differently. The facts are most people on the Left are like most normal people &#8211; they don&#8217;t go out and get into fights all the time and they dont actively seek getting into them the way some of the fascists might do. </p>
<p>This is because folk round about and in the SDL are asocial nutters who often dont have the basic respect for other folk most working people have and dont see anything unacceptable about living your life fighting wi folk all the time. Different people have different roles and you need to accept that the majority of folk who go on anti fascist demos probably arent psychos like the SDL, and make sure you have the numbers so if they try anything physical they wont win. I think weve successfully done that on both occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Iain, how old are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iain, how old are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiannanahalba</title>
		<link>http://ssy.org.uk/2010/02/square-go-wi-the-sdl-in-edinburger/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>fiannanahalba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ssy.org.uk/?p=670#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Andy it was an SSY banner, so it would most likely be SSY holding it? The police stopped the EDL/SDL to a greater extent than what was mobilised. Or are you suggesting that the operation was off the cuff when they saw the anti fascist demo? Im sorry but its dangerous if anyone believes the anti fascists could have driven off the fash with no police presence on the scale they were out. I concede the left got decent numbers out and the fash were below what i expected, but as i said they were severely disrupted by the police.

Sarah they killed who they intended to kill, the pizza guys are ok. 

Jack only ever heard that expression from middle class lefts, if the cap fits.... So you think socialism can be achieved by non violent means exclusively? Do you just shout at fascists when behind police lines? Will they always be there to protect the left? As for what ive got behind me, im sure you can get that info easily enough on the net. Whats madcap about organising collectively but realising there are different roles for comrades? And is your brand doing so well? We could at least have a dialogue around programme and methods? Im trying to see what the SSY could give to republican youth.

Liam- students are often working class but im sure youd agree that student life and politics is often lifestylism and a conveyor belt into the middle class professions. Im trying to build amongst the non student working class- amongst workers and the unemployed because i still believe that the workplace and the working class community is where we will build the forces necessary for the defeat of capitalism and its state.


Lynsey of course they can and the ruling class has always wanted a more educated working class and has for a long time allowed entry to HE to a section of working class youth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy it was an SSY banner, so it would most likely be SSY holding it? The police stopped the EDL/SDL to a greater extent than what was mobilised. Or are you suggesting that the operation was off the cuff when they saw the anti fascist demo? Im sorry but its dangerous if anyone believes the anti fascists could have driven off the fash with no police presence on the scale they were out. I concede the left got decent numbers out and the fash were below what i expected, but as i said they were severely disrupted by the police.</p>
<p>Sarah they killed who they intended to kill, the pizza guys are ok. </p>
<p>Jack only ever heard that expression from middle class lefts, if the cap fits&#8230;. So you think socialism can be achieved by non violent means exclusively? Do you just shout at fascists when behind police lines? Will they always be there to protect the left? As for what ive got behind me, im sure you can get that info easily enough on the net. Whats madcap about organising collectively but realising there are different roles for comrades? And is your brand doing so well? We could at least have a dialogue around programme and methods? Im trying to see what the SSY could give to republican youth.</p>
<p>Liam- students are often working class but im sure youd agree that student life and politics is often lifestylism and a conveyor belt into the middle class professions. Im trying to build amongst the non student working class- amongst workers and the unemployed because i still believe that the workplace and the working class community is where we will build the forces necessary for the defeat of capitalism and its state.</p>
<p>Lynsey of course they can and the ruling class has always wanted a more educated working class and has for a long time allowed entry to HE to a section of working class youth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

